As the dust settled from last week’s presidential debate, a video clip featuring Jill Biden assisting her husband off the stage began circulating. This moment sparked a narrative on conservative media that highlighted concerns about President Biden’s age and fitness for office.
Since before he took office, right-wing pundits have questioned Mr. Biden’s ability to fulfill his duties, citing instances of him falling, tripping, or stumbling in public. And despite occasional strong performances, conservative critics have insinuated that he was using performance-enhancing substances to bolster his appearances.
However, after the debate, where Mr. Biden’s performance was widely criticized, concerns about his fitness for office permeated through many media outlets on the right. Several conservative voices couldn’t resist reveling in his perceived inadequacies.
Some conservative commentators went as far as to accuse the mainstream press of ignoring Biden’s shortcomings, while they congratulated themselves for their early warnings. National Review, for example, ran a series of articles celebrating their foresight regarding Mr. Biden’s cognitive decline.
In the aftermath of the debate, many right-wing media figures seemed almost jubilant at their newfound sense of validation, unsure of how to proceed next. Some delved into conspiracy theories about Biden’s campaign, alleging fraud and elder abuse.
Despite the fervor from some conservative circles, a few voices suggested caution, warning against hyperbolic reactions to the situation. Republican campaign strategist Barrett Marson advised restraint, urging observers to let events unfold.
Amidst the polarized reactions, there were individuals like Greta Van Susteren who expressed empathy for Mr. Biden’s struggles, recognizing the challenges of watching an elderly man face scrutiny on a public stage.
