As we enter another year of debate surrounding Robert Kraft’s candidacy for the Pro Football Hall of Fame, the discussion has gained global attention thanks to Don Van Natta Jr.’s revealing piece on ESPN. The mystery of why Kraft has yet to receive the distinguished call from Canton has flummoxed many in the football world.
There is no doubt that Kraft deserves a spot in the Hall of Fame. His impact extends far beyond the six Super Bowl championships with the Patriots. Kraft’s keen business sense, deep Boston roots, and personal ties to the city make him a perfect candidate for enshrinement.
While the question of Kraft’s candidacy may seem nuanced, the NFL’s Owner Glorification Project has played a significant role in bringing it to the forefront. From elaborate draft day spectacles to prime-time games that focus on owners’ boxes, the league has elevated team owners to celebrity status.
The comparison between Kraft and other Hall of Fame owners like Jerry Jones is inevitable. In an era where owners occupy a prominent role in the narrative of football, it’s no surprise that Kraft’s omission from the Hall of Fame is a topic of discussion.
The NFL’s emphasis on promoting team owners is unprecedented. The league has successfully marketed owners as essential components of the game, alongside players and coaches. This trend has transformed previously unknown owners into household names.
Robert Kraft’s influence was notably highlighted in a pivotal game against the Baltimore Ravens back in 2007. As the Patriots faced a challenging situation, the broadcast repeatedly cut to Kraft in the owner’s box, emphasizing his role in the team’s success.
While the NFL’s efforts to celebrate team owners are commendable, the extent to which they have elevated owners’ status raises questions. Should owners be revered to the same degree as players and coaches?
(Photo: Maddie Meyer / Getty Images)
